Skip to main content

Labour Law: Equal Remuneration Act

 





Case Laws based on Equal Remuneration Act 

Randhir Singh vs Union of India, 1982

It was held that though equal pay for equal wages is not the fundamental right under the constitution, still it is considered as a certain constitutional goal.

Surinder Singh vs Engineer in Chief PWD, 1986

Daily wages would be entitled the workers doing the identical work in the same department. 

State of West Bengal & Ors. vs Hari Narayan Showal and Ors.

In case an expert committee is paid more as compared to the daily wage workers, a writ cannot be issued under Article 14 and 32. It was held that the level of expertise found is not equal. Hence, equal wages would not be paid.

State of Punjab vs Talwinder Singh and Ors 2004

Daily wage workers claimed parity of pay scale with those on regular basis. Granting minimum wages according to the pay scale was held valid.

Govt of West Bengal cat vs Tarun K. Roy, 2004

The principle of equal wages cannot apply in case where the educational qualification of two classes of person do vary. This is because the nature or the work is not same.

State of MP and Ors vs Pramod Bhatiya and Ors, 1993

In case it was found that the duty and function, responsibilities of both categories of the lecturers is same or identical. In such a case there would be equal wages for equal work paid.

M/s Mackinon Mackenie & Co. Ltd vs Andy D-Cousta & Ors.

No discrimination of male or female stenographer should be made. There cannot be any provision that the confidential stenographer can only be female workers. It would violate equal pay for equal work. 


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Book Review for Law School: Law of Torts by RK Bangia

by Harmanjot Kaur Book Review: RK Bangia Even before entering into Law School, we are often bombarded with legal maxims and Case Laws for CLAT and other such law school entrance exams. 'Res Ipsa Loquitor' is one of these famous maxims, we often encounter in law schools. However, in order to ease the process and not bunging the whole year in stress and law school books, we would discuss the pros and cons of choosing the books. And one can choose the one which suits best according to the strengths and weaknesses. Law school is full of confusion and chaos. One day you would be involved in some moot court, another day there would be some debate competition going on. Here, we would review a shortlist of books and how to choose which would work best in the career of the law field.  The first year of law school would include the smearing of the book named 'Law of Torts' authored by RK Bangia. Here we would have a book review of the book as if this would serve the purpose vivid...
Post a Comment
Read more

Memorandum of Association

 Memorandum of Association  Introduction Meaning of Memorandum of Association What is the charging section of the 'Memorandum of Association'? What are the components of the 'Memorandum of Association'? Conclusion The Memorandum of Association is a document that governs the relations of a  company with the outside world. It is one of the most important documents needed for the incorporation of a company.  The Memorandum of Association is charged under Section 399 of the Companies Act, 2013 The MoA is considered as the constitution of the company. It provides the foundation to the structure or the building of the company. The MoA is defined as a company's charter. It defines the limitation of the company's powers. Particular parts of the memorandum can be altered whenever and however required. The MoA enables the shareholders, creditors and investors to know the permitting range of the company. It regulates  the company's external affairs. Importance of...
Post a Comment
Read more

Gender Justice: Landmark Judgements

  by Harmanjot Kaur  * Case Laws on Gender Justice The Secretary, Ministry of Defence vs Babita Puniya & Ors., 2020 Discrimination on the basis of sex is a violation of Articles 14, 19 and 21. The women candidates should also be allowed to join NDA and Army. Regardless of the gender of any individual, if they fulfil the prerequisite conditions.  Federation of Obstetric and Gynecological Societies of India vs Union of India, 2019 Giving the preference to a male child is a violation of Article 39A of the Indian Constitution. We should renounce this practice of prenatal sex determination. It is termed derogatory by the Hon'ble Court,  Joseph Shrine vs UOI, 2018 Section 497 of IPC, 1860 is unconstitutional. It  violates the right to privacy and liberty. Danamma @Suman Surpus vs Amar, 2018 The right of a daughter to be entitled an equal share in the property right.  (Hindu Succession Act, 1956)  Mackinnon Mackenzie & Co. vs Audry D'Costa & Anrs...
Post a Comment
Read more